The final paper should describe what you have done and how it worked. It should also speculate on why your approach did or did not work and on directions for future research. Here is a sample outline for a paper describing an experimental study:
You should pick a convention for citing material. I honestly don't care which one you pick as long as it is not of your own making and you use it consistently and correctly. The Chicago Manual of Style and the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association both contain information about how to properly cite and reference scholarly material.
Not all references are created equal. Peer-reviewed journal and conference papers are the gold standard, so most of your references should come from these sources. Books, edited volumes, and invited papers are also important and acceptable. Newspaper and magazine articles are usually not acceptable except to motivate the need for research in a certain area. For example, a Post article on the number of computer break-ins at the Pentagon could be used to motivate research on machine learning approaches for computer intrusion detection.
Furthermore, in the age of the Web, you must be very careful about using material from Web pages, simply because there are no checks and balances, no filters for credibility and veracity, for what someone can place there. The Web is an important research tool, but one that does not yet supplant traditional library research. Students in the past have used material they found on the Web as if it came from a peer-reviewed source. If you're unsure about a reference, bring it by, and we'll take a look at it.
Here is a sample in PDF format: sample.pdf.